Of Ahmad Ismail, Mahathir, Big Dog and Wong Chun Wai


Malaysian uberblogger Rocky has highlighted the amusing, entertaining and growing debate surrounding Umno Bukit Bendera Chief Ahmad Ismail’s remark that Malaysian Chinese were pendatang (squatters or newcomers) and therefore should not aspire to having equal rights as Malays in Malaysia.

His refusal sparked more criticisms and the government, not Ahmad, began to apologize for his remarks. This is where things start to get muddled, as they are wont to get in Bolehland, especially when Mahathir wades in.

Mahathir, now out of a political office and given short shrift by present political leaders has taken to blogging to make himself heard. He took up the Ahmad Ismail issue, and had several posts on the issue. In many of them he is reasonable and declares that he does not like no really supports what Ahmad said. But in one posting he expresses his disgust at how the Prime Minister and his deputy were now so busy apologizing for what Ahmad said. he also suggested that Indian and Chinese leaders should apologize instead for other issues such as the Wee Meng Chee issue and the Hindraf allegations.

This is where Wong Chun Wai, the blogging chief editor of the Star stepped in, berating Mahathir for widening the issue into a racial one when the issue at hand is Ahmad Ismail’s remark and whether he should apologize for making it. This is where things spiral and get muddled as things are wont to do in Bolehland and the issue began morphing from one about Ahmad Ismail to that about the integrity and caliber of top editors in Malaysia.

Big Dog, a self-styled “liberal-minded right winger”, posted Chun Wai: Blinkered racism analysis to demonise a Statesman? . As the title suggests he says Wong was out to demonize Mahathir and cites as proof Wong’s apparent silence against the leaders of the other races in the issues that Mahathir brings up. Another blogger, Apanama has also jumpd into the fray in attacking Wong.

Debate on Ahmad Ismail now looks like its going for a gangbang with everyone talking about everything but the issue at hand. If Big Dog and Apanama as well as others want to start a conversation about the quality of editors and journalists they should just start a new thread like what Bakri Musa’s done, not confuse the issues by drgging up the past andmaking this a conversation about editors and racism rather than whether Ahmad Ismail should apologize.

So, should Ahmad Ismail apologize?

5 thoughts on “Of Ahmad Ismail, Mahathir, Big Dog and Wong Chun Wai

  1. The bottom-line is, black cannot be white and no matter how much this Ahmad Ismail want to twist and turn, he will still be labeled a racist. Today, Sin Chew made a statement (http://www.mysinchew.com/node/16002) and Sin Chew stand by what their reporter has reported.

    So I suppose it will be pointless to debate further on this Ahmad Ismail’s stunt and to deny him extra publicity.

    Like

  2. This is NOT a simple case of defiance, it will remind older folks of May 13 1969. The same puppet master is still around, Mahathir’s support for Ahmad Ismail is NOTHING MORE than a signal for UMNO ultras to bring down BOTH Badawi and Najib the way the Kutty brought down our beloved Tunku Abdul Rahman. Toyol’s bark of May 13 II today was the go signal, I wish Badawi, Najib and Khairy wise up to the fascist moves of Mahathir Bapa Hypocrisi, Korupsi dan Sodomi Melayu.

    Like

  3. THIS MEANS WAR!!!

    Datuk Ahmad Ismail is an advocate of fascism. He is a fascist through action and remarks. A fascist always promotes one class of citizens (themselves)that is considered superior (good) to another (bad) based upon race, creed or origin.

    Islam promotes peace, tolerance and harmony. I doubt his level of Islamic teachings in him. He has brought total shame on the religion, has disrespect the constitution and King of Malaysia and the very nature of Malaysians as peace loving people.

    This means war against fascist like this Ahmad Ismail. There are many more fascist out there in the country like him.

    Datuk Ahmad Ismail is not fit to be a Datuk. His title should be stripped. He should be stripped of citizenship. For all you know he could be the instigator of the Jews, or the western powers like USA who sought to destabilize our country.

    Like

  4. There is no point in apologising if he doesn’t mean it. Furthermore he’s helping Pakatan Rakyat in doing more groundwork for UMNO to fall more quickly now. The feelings of the rakyat are overwhelmingly anti-BN after this incident. If BN had hoped for chaos, I believe it won’t happen. The rakyat is more mature now.

    If there is a GE right now, BN would certainly lose their pants.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s