This is an opinion piece I wrote for The Palm Scribe:
Iceland Managing Director Richard Walker’s announcement that the frozen food chain will be banning the use of palm oil in its own brand products by the end of this year would strike some as a laudable and heroic effort to get the industry to be sustainable.
This is especially so when we see the youthful Walker being filmed, in a video released by Iceland Foods, braving forests, swamps and what appears to be palm oil caused wastelands in Indonesia to uncover the truth about palm oil.
In the video Walker is big on the word prove.
His visit to Indonesia, he said, has convinced him that “currently no major supermarket or food manufacturer can fully prove that the palm oil they use is truly sustainable and the damaged being cause to the global environment as precious rainforest continues to be lost.
he goes on, saying that Iceland’s ban on palm oil in its own brand products is a way to “prove to the food industry that there is no need to participate in the destruction of the rainforest.”
As such “removing palm oil is the only way we can prove to our customers that our products are not a cause of environmental destruction.”
Walker is young and idealistic. The 37-year old geography graduate from Durham University has been in this job for three years. Before that he was the International Business Director of Iceland. He is also the son of the founder and CEO of Iceland, Sir Malcom Walker.
Richard’s idealism is laudable. But has he been misguided in announcing the ban?
Here are three reasons why his decision may have been misguided:
vested interest groups… Iceland are sparking debate- good on you Richard for the initiative